
- Alternative Education
- Assessment & Evaluation
- Educational Leadership
- Educational Philosophy
- Educational Research
- Educational Technology
- Educational Videos
- Education Economics
- Education Environment
- Education Issues
- Education Policy
- Education Psychology
- Education Reform
- Education Theory
- Homeless Education
- Homeschooling in the United States
- Pedagogy
- Sociology of Education

- After School Programs
- Arts in America
- Camp Services
- Colleges & Universities
- Disorder and Disability Services
- Driving Schools
- Exhibits and Museums
- Financial Aid
- International Programs
- Libraries
- Prom Services
- School Assembly Programs
- School Directories
- School Districts
- School Supplies
- School Vendors
- Students in Crisis
- Trade Schools
- Volunteer Programs
- Youth Sports
- Youth Weight Loss

- Academic Standards
- Assembly Programs
- Blue Ribbon Schools Program
- Class Trips
- Educational Television Channels
- Education in the United States
- History of Education in the United States
- Reading Education in the U.S.
- School Grades
- School Supplies
- School Types
- School Vendors
- Special Education in the United States
- Systems of Formal Education
- U.S. Education Legislation
Home |
Standardized Testing
Standardized testing is used as a public policy strategy to establish stronger accountability measures for public education. While the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) has served as an educational barometer for some thirty years by administering standardized tests on a regular basis to random schools throughout the United States, efforts over the last decade at the state and federal levels have mandated annual standardized test administration for all public schools across the country.
The idea behind the standardized testing policy movement is that testing is the first step to improving schools, teaching practice, and educational methods through data collection. Proponents argue that the data generated by the standardized tests act like a 'report card' for the community, demonstrating how well local schools are performing. Critics of the movement, however, point to various discrepancies that result from current state standardized testing practices, including problems with test validity and reliability and false correlations.
Critics charge that standardized tests became a mandatory curriculum placed into schools without public debate and without any accountability measures of its own. Many feel this ignores basic democratic principles in that control of schools' curricula is removed from local school boards, which are the nominal curricular authority in the U.S. While some maintain that it would be preferable to simply introduce mandatory national curricula, others feel that state mandated standardized testing should stop altogether in order that schools can focus their efforts on instructing their students as they see fit.
Critics also charge that standardized tests encourage "teaching to the test" at the expense of creativity and in-depth coverage of subjects not on the test. Multiple choice tests are criticized for failing to assess skills such as writing. Furthermore, student's success is being tracked to a teacher's relative performance, making teacher advancement contingent upon a teacher's success with a student's academic performance. Ethical and economical questions arise for teachers when faced with clearly under performing or under skilled students and a standardized test.
